Indexed News on:

--the California "Mega-Park" Project

Tracking measurable success on efforts across California to preserve and connect our Parks & Wildlife Corridors



WE POST NEWS THREE WAYS:
1. long detailed stories on blogspot (here!)
2. short messages on Twitter
3. automated news feeds from CA enviro websites in the right-hand column which change frequently and are not archived by our website (that's why we now have a twitter account to permanently capture the memorable feeds)

Saturday, January 31, 2009

-
One of G.W. Bush's Last Acts was to Finish Review of the Tejon Ranch-Condor Permit


Tejon Ranch Seeks Permit to Harm Condor, 26 Other Rare Species

1/29/2009-From the Center for Biological Diversity: Starting the countdown to destroy prime habitat for the endangered California condor, last Friday the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service released a draft plan that would allow the Tejon Ranch Company to harm the condor and 26 other rare species on Tejon Ranch, the largest swath of privately owned land in California. The poorly named "habitat conservation plan" would let the company slide past laws that make it illegal to injure, harass, and in some cases kill federally protected species in its move to build mega-developments on the condor's last bastion of wild habitat -- even as the company claims its developments won't hurt the condor. Tejon Ranch covers more than 270,000 acres of wilderness and contains not only federally protected condor habitat but also the convergence of four ecoregions, 23 known types of plant communities, and habitat for many other at-risk species, from the southwestern willow flycatcher to the western spadefoot toad.

The Center for Biological Diversity has been fighting to save Tejon for years, and we're determined to forever preserve the ranch as a state or national park. We certainly won't let the disastrous habitat conservation plan go through as written.

Read more in the Los Angeles Times. http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/center/articles/2009/los-angeles-times-01-23-2009.html

For more from the Center for Biological Diversity: http://yubanet.com/california/Tejon-Ranch-Seeks-Permit-to-Harm-California-Condor.php

http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2009/tejon-ranch-01-23-2009.html
-----------------------

http://www.turnto23.com/news/18591156/detail.html

The FWS drafted four alternatives: a no-action plan; a plan that takes measures just to protect condors; a general plan buildout; and a multi-species habitat conservation plan, the preferred alternative, Grunwald said.

----------------

http://www.bakersfield.com/102/story/662193.html

Adam Keats, director of the Center’s Urban Wildlands Program, said Tejon Mountain Village will be located in an area that connects the condor’s historical range — the coastal range, Tehachapis and lower Sierra.

“With only 200 or 300 condors existing on this planet, they’re going to stick a housing development right in the linchpin,” he said.


http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2009/01/the-tejon-ranch.html
Tejon Mountain Village, in addition to other activities including mining and construction of a new 502-acre national veterans cemetery, would consume about 8% of the federally designated critical habitat for condors in the area covered by the Tehachapi Uplands Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan.

http://ca.audubon.org/tejon_slides/
a slide show of the ranch's natural values, with some pro-Tejon development propaganda
-------------

Release of Tejon Plan by Obama Administration Might Have Been Accidental??

http://www.mountainenterprise.com/atf.php?sid=4312

At the end of the business day on Friday, Jan. 23—in the week which also saw the inauguration of a new president—the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) sent out a press release alerting editors that a document has been published in the Federal Register to begin the public review and comment period about what promises to be a highly controversial Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) regarding the critical habitat of the endangered California condor.

According to Lois Grunwald of the USFWS, the Obama administration ordered all such publication to be halted while the new administration reviews what has been put into the pipeline by the outgoing administration. "Such an order is not uncommon," Grunwald said, adding that most incoming administrations issue orders to freeze Federal Register publication of such items during a transition review period.

"But somehow the EIS slipped through the cracks and got published last week," Grunwald said. Tejon Ranch Company's conservation plan for habitat of the California condor (and a score of other threatened and endangered plant and animal species) did not get published in the Federal Register along with the USFWS impact statement, she said. The USFWS has placed both documents on their website however. [See URL below.]

The footprint of Tejon Ranch Company's proposed Tejon Mountain Village puts 3,500 homes, resort hotels and commercial areas partially within critical habitat for the condor and other listed species.The Fish and Wildlife Service's Environmental Impact Statement explains the agency's evaluation of Tejon's plan to protect the habitat while proceeding with its development and ranching activities.

Public review and comment on the Environmental Impact Statement is solicited until April 22. Public input on Tejon Ranch Company's habitat conservation plan (HCP) can also be submitted within that period, but an additional public review and input period will be announced once the HCP is officially published in the Federal Register, Grunwald said.

The statements and plan are required as part of Tejon's request for an "incidental take permit" to disturb or cause the death of threatened or endangered species. On June 4, 2008, Tejon Ranch Company issued a statement saying "the proposed Tehachapi Uplands Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan, which would require the approval of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, provides comprehensive protection for 34 different species of plants and animals that inhabit the Tehachapi Mountains...."

The statement emphasized that Tejon Ranch is not seeking a lethal take permit for the California condor. "The characterization by some of the TUMSHCP as 'a license to kill condors' is therefore inflammatory and false," the Tejon statement declared, adding that hunting is not classified as a “covered activity” under the MSHCP. This is a sensitive issue, because the most experienced remaining condor born and matured in the wild—a matriarch known as AC-8 that was critical to the condor preservation program—was killed by a pig hunter on the ranch in February 2003.

Condor are intelligent and curious birds that are highly unusual in that they spend their first eight to nine years learning from older birds about their habitat before they begin reproducing, according to interviews with wildlife biologists. The loss of the matriarch that had spent about 58 years learning the upland ridges and plains that provided traditional roosting and foraging habitat for the endangered species was a major loss to the restoration program. Today there are roughly 80 of the iconic birds left flying free in the state.

The unique behaviors of the condor are frequently overlooked in statements made by developers about the compatibility of overlapping human commercial activiities and critical habitat, according to some involved in the condor reclamation effort.

This is a direct link to the draft EIS [Editor's Note: On Friday afternoon at 5 p.m. The Mountain Enterprise staff noticed that some links in this URL are not functional.]:

www.fws.gov/ventura/endangered/hconservation/hcp/hcfiles/TehachapiUpland/index.html

-------------------

Another interesting comment from the web:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2009/01/conservation-pl.html#comment-145836570

good lord, is CBD the ONLY environmental organization that cares about ANYTHING anymore? sierra club, NRDC, Wilderness Society - they are all a bunch of sellouts to Big Energy, Big Developers, Big Chemicals. who are you mercenaries and what have you done with our environmentalists?

these organizations should all be completely discredited until they ditch their current sellout mentalities (and all those supporting that mentality) and only REAL environmentalists should be allowed to negotiate, comment, partner or otherwise exploit their brands.

start with getting rid of everyone in the organization who agrees that "mitigation" is a dandy solution. next, get rid of everyone who believes that permanently killing millions of acres of wilderness for Big Energy profiteers (in Big Wind and Big Solar) is a recipe for SAVING the planet, when the rest of us are trying to get policies that increase rooftop solar and save the deserts, plains, mountains and other "sacrifice areas" these Big "Enviros" want to destroy.

at that point, we can talk about environmental cred. until then, just greenwashers, all of them.

GO CBD!!! YOU RULE!!!

--attributed to Sheila


No comments: